https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=86724 Rule 31 governing reference applications under the CEGAT Procedure Rules differed in text and purpose from Rule 31A governing rectification, so the reasoning in Elpro International Ltd. on same-Member hearing for rectification could not be applied to reference applications. Reference applications seek determination of a question of law by the High Court and are posted according to the Tribunal's procedural framework, not by analogy to rectification practice. The power to regulate roster and posting lies with the President, and a Bench cannot direct the Registry to list the matter before a particular Member or Bench. Reference applications must therefore be listed and heard in accordance with the President's prevailing orders. en-us Fri, 28 Nov 1997 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 26 Aug 2011 17:14:44 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=86724 Rule 31 governing reference applications under the CEGAT Procedure Rules differed in text and purpose from Rule 31A governing rectification, so the reasoning in Elpro International Ltd. on same-Member hearing for rectification could not be applied to reference applications. Reference applications seek determination of a question of law by the High Court and are posted according to the Tribunal's procedural framework, not by analogy to rectification practice. The power to regulate roster and posting lies with the President, and a Bench cannot direct the Registry to list the matter before a particular Member or Bench. Reference applications must therefore be listed and heard in accordance with the President's prevailing orders. Case-Laws Central Excise Fri, 28 Nov 1997 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=86724