<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1997 (5) TMI 121 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=86693</link>
    <description>Customs classification of the imported goods could not be sustained on the basis of a non-speaking order because the lower authorities had not examined the tariff description, the functions shown in the drawings and technical write-up, or the material on record. The relevant explanatory notes were also not properly considered. The impugned order was therefore set aside and the matter was remanded for de novo consideration after hearing the party and passing a reasoned order.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 19 May 1997 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 26 Aug 2011 15:32:54 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=123760" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1997 (5) TMI 121 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=86693</link>
      <description>Customs classification of the imported goods could not be sustained on the basis of a non-speaking order because the lower authorities had not examined the tariff description, the functions shown in the drawings and technical write-up, or the material on record. The relevant explanatory notes were also not properly considered. The impugned order was therefore set aside and the matter was remanded for de novo consideration after hearing the party and passing a reasoned order.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 19 May 1997 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=86693</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>