<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1997 (5) TMI 117 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=86689</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appellant&#039;s claims for abatement on discount for damage in transit, bank charges for realization of sale proceeds, HDPE bags cost, and deductions for goods supplied to the Canteen Store Department. The adjudicating authority was directed to re-examine the claims for bank charges and HDPE bags in accordance with the law. The appeal was allowed on these grounds.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 13 May 1997 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 26 Aug 2011 15:27:30 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=123756" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1997 (5) TMI 117 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=86689</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appellant&#039;s claims for abatement on discount for damage in transit, bank charges for realization of sale proceeds, HDPE bags cost, and deductions for goods supplied to the Canteen Store Department. The adjudicating authority was directed to re-examine the claims for bank charges and HDPE bags in accordance with the law. The appeal was allowed on these grounds.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 13 May 1997 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=86689</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>