<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1997 (5) TMI 112 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=86683</link>
    <description>Amounts collected from industrial consumers under a modernisation and renovation surcharge scheme were not deductible from assessable value as a trade discount or rebate under Section 4 of the Central Excises Act, 1944. The collection was treated as a borrowing arrangement for a specified purpose, with repayment contemplated later, and the later return of the amount was only repayment of an earlier collection. Payment of duty on the amount in the earlier year did not create any right to deduction in the later year, so the abatement claim failed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 02 May 1997 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 26 Aug 2011 15:12:05 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=123750" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1997 (5) TMI 112 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=86683</link>
      <description>Amounts collected from industrial consumers under a modernisation and renovation surcharge scheme were not deductible from assessable value as a trade discount or rebate under Section 4 of the Central Excises Act, 1944. The collection was treated as a borrowing arrangement for a specified purpose, with repayment contemplated later, and the later return of the amount was only repayment of an earlier collection. Payment of duty on the amount in the earlier year did not create any right to deduction in the later year, so the abatement claim failed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 02 May 1997 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=86683</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>