<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1997 (5) TMI 111 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=86682</link>
    <description>The Tribunal partially set aside the Collector (Appeals) order, confirming duty demands for one show cause notice but rejecting demands under others. It held that demands under most notices were unsustainable, except for one post-1-3-1986. The appellant was entitled to duty exemption under Notification No. 120/75 until its expiry and was not required to pay duty beyond rubber lining and job charges. Appeals were disposed of accordingly.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 02 May 1997 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 26 Aug 2011 15:10:25 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=123749" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1997 (5) TMI 111 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=86682</link>
      <description>The Tribunal partially set aside the Collector (Appeals) order, confirming duty demands for one show cause notice but rejecting demands under others. It held that demands under most notices were unsustainable, except for one post-1-3-1986. The appellant was entitled to duty exemption under Notification No. 120/75 until its expiry and was not required to pay duty beyond rubber lining and job charges. Appeals were disposed of accordingly.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 02 May 1997 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=86682</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>