<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1997 (3) TMI 239 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=86655</link>
    <description>Notification No. 63/88-Customs was held applicable to Foley&#039;s Catheter imported for supply to a government hospital, because the prescribed certificate and hospital endorsement showed the goods were meant for hospital use and the exemption was not limited to direct imports by the hospital. The item was also not excluded as a consumable, since consumables were understood in their ordinary sense as items used up in the course of use or manufacture, and Foley&#039;s Catheter had been treated as life-saving equipment rather than a mere disposable article. The denial of exemption was therefore set aside and the appeal succeeded.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 25 Mar 1997 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 26 Aug 2011 12:42:53 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=123722" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1997 (3) TMI 239 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=86655</link>
      <description>Notification No. 63/88-Customs was held applicable to Foley&#039;s Catheter imported for supply to a government hospital, because the prescribed certificate and hospital endorsement showed the goods were meant for hospital use and the exemption was not limited to direct imports by the hospital. The item was also not excluded as a consumable, since consumables were understood in their ordinary sense as items used up in the course of use or manufacture, and Foley&#039;s Catheter had been treated as life-saving equipment rather than a mere disposable article. The denial of exemption was therefore set aside and the appeal succeeded.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 25 Mar 1997 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=86655</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>