<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1997 (3) TMI 236 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=86652</link>
    <description>Imported printer heads were accepted as line printers on the bill of entry and supported by departmental material, so they qualified for exemption under Notification No. 186/87-Customs. Exemption under Notification No. 172/77-Customs was unavailable because the goods contained transistors and diodes excluded by that notification. Where the assessment had described the goods as line printers and no Revenue appeal had been filed, the appellate authority could not reclassify them to the importer&#039;s prejudice and withdraw the exemption on a different classification view. The impugned order was set aside and the exemption claim was allowed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 20 Mar 1997 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 26 Aug 2011 12:34:46 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=123719" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1997 (3) TMI 236 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=86652</link>
      <description>Imported printer heads were accepted as line printers on the bill of entry and supported by departmental material, so they qualified for exemption under Notification No. 186/87-Customs. Exemption under Notification No. 172/77-Customs was unavailable because the goods contained transistors and diodes excluded by that notification. Where the assessment had described the goods as line printers and no Revenue appeal had been filed, the appellate authority could not reclassify them to the importer&#039;s prejudice and withdraw the exemption on a different classification view. The impugned order was set aside and the exemption claim was allowed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 20 Mar 1997 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=86652</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>