<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1997 (3) TMI 215 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=86631</link>
    <description>Modvat credit was treated as admissible on hydrochloric acid and sulphuric acid used to purify glycerine where the purified glycerine had a direct nexus with manufacture of soap, and credit could not be denied merely because the inputs related to a by-product. The text also states that inputs received before filing of the declaration could not be rejected solely on that procedural ground, because the claim required examination under the transitional provision and substantive credit should not fail for a procedural lapse when the goods were available for verification. The matter was therefore to be reconsidered under the transitional scheme.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 14 Mar 1997 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 26 Aug 2011 11:50:48 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=123698" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1997 (3) TMI 215 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=86631</link>
      <description>Modvat credit was treated as admissible on hydrochloric acid and sulphuric acid used to purify glycerine where the purified glycerine had a direct nexus with manufacture of soap, and credit could not be denied merely because the inputs related to a by-product. The text also states that inputs received before filing of the declaration could not be rejected solely on that procedural ground, because the claim required examination under the transitional provision and substantive credit should not fail for a procedural lapse when the goods were available for verification. The matter was therefore to be reconsidered under the transitional scheme.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 14 Mar 1997 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=86631</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>