https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=86607 Suppression of manufacture and clearance of excisable goods with intent to evade duty justified invocation of the extended limitation period under the proviso to Section 11A. The Tribunal rejected the plea of bona fide belief because the relevant exemption amendment had been published in the Official Gazette, the assessees continued clearances after the goods became dutiable, and they failed to comply with licensing and declaration requirements. On those facts, the cited precedent was distinguishable and the demand was not confined to six months. en-us Fri, 28 Feb 1997 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 25 Aug 2011 18:37:25 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=86607 Suppression of manufacture and clearance of excisable goods with intent to evade duty justified invocation of the extended limitation period under the proviso to Section 11A. The Tribunal rejected the plea of bona fide belief because the relevant exemption amendment had been published in the Official Gazette, the assessees continued clearances after the goods became dutiable, and they failed to comply with licensing and declaration requirements. On those facts, the cited precedent was distinguishable and the demand was not confined to six months. Case-Laws Central Excise Fri, 28 Feb 1997 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=86607