<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1997 (2) TMI 263 - CEGAT, MADRAS</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=86599</link>
    <description>The Tribunal held that Modvat Credit was not available for items not declared, emphasizing the need for verification based on the filed declaration. Regarding Amonia Paper, the credit was disallowed as it was deemed a preparatory process not integrally connected to the manufacturing stream. For Tools, insufficient details led to a remand for further examination to determine eligibility. The appeal was remanded for reconsideration, granting the respondent an opportunity to be heard.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 24 Feb 1997 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 25 Aug 2011 18:18:57 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=123666" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1997 (2) TMI 263 - CEGAT, MADRAS</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=86599</link>
      <description>The Tribunal held that Modvat Credit was not available for items not declared, emphasizing the need for verification based on the filed declaration. Regarding Amonia Paper, the credit was disallowed as it was deemed a preparatory process not integrally connected to the manufacturing stream. For Tools, insufficient details led to a remand for further examination to determine eligibility. The appeal was remanded for reconsideration, granting the respondent an opportunity to be heard.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 24 Feb 1997 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=86599</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>