<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1997 (2) TMI 259 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=86595</link>
    <description>Delay in producing an eligibility certificate does not, by itself, defeat an exemption claim where the substantive conditions of the notification are otherwise satisfied. The Tribunal held that exemption cannot be denied merely because the certificate was filed after the original assessment, so long as the certificate otherwise establishes entitlement. Subsequent production was therefore sufficient to preserve the benefit of the notification.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 19 Feb 1997 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 25 Aug 2011 18:07:06 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=123662" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1997 (2) TMI 259 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=86595</link>
      <description>Delay in producing an eligibility certificate does not, by itself, defeat an exemption claim where the substantive conditions of the notification are otherwise satisfied. The Tribunal held that exemption cannot be denied merely because the certificate was filed after the original assessment, so long as the certificate otherwise establishes entitlement. Subsequent production was therefore sufficient to preserve the benefit of the notification.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 19 Feb 1997 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=86595</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>