<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1997 (1) TMI 275 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=86570</link>
    <description>Modvat credit was considered admissible on Residual Fuel Oil and Low Density Oil used as fuel in diesel generating sets to produce electricity for running electric arc furnaces and other manufacturing operations. Rule 57A was read broadly to cover inputs used in or in relation to manufacture, and the later Explanation adding inputs used as fuel was treated as clarificatory rather than restrictive. Because the electricity generated was an intermediary product essential to production, and the oils were also used directly at stages of manufacture, denial of credit on the ground that electricity was not the final excisable product was not accepted. The disallowance was therefore unsustainable.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 31 Jan 1997 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 25 Aug 2011 16:24:28 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=123637" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1997 (1) TMI 275 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=86570</link>
      <description>Modvat credit was considered admissible on Residual Fuel Oil and Low Density Oil used as fuel in diesel generating sets to produce electricity for running electric arc furnaces and other manufacturing operations. Rule 57A was read broadly to cover inputs used in or in relation to manufacture, and the later Explanation adding inputs used as fuel was treated as clarificatory rather than restrictive. Because the electricity generated was an intermediary product essential to production, and the oils were also used directly at stages of manufacture, denial of credit on the ground that electricity was not the final excisable product was not accepted. The disallowance was therefore unsustainable.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 31 Jan 1997 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=86570</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>