<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1997 (1) TMI 261 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=86555</link>
    <description>The appeal was allowed as the judge found that the Modvat credit taken by the appellants was admissible based on the specific types of invoices presented. The judge allowed the credit taken on endorsed gate passes and original invoices, as well as endorsed manufacturer&#039;s and dealer invoices, in accordance with relevant government notifications and orders. The judge directed that any consequential relief be granted to the appellants as per the law.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 15 Jan 1997 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 25 Aug 2011 15:34:34 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=123622" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1997 (1) TMI 261 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=86555</link>
      <description>The appeal was allowed as the judge found that the Modvat credit taken by the appellants was admissible based on the specific types of invoices presented. The judge allowed the credit taken on endorsed gate passes and original invoices, as well as endorsed manufacturer&#039;s and dealer invoices, in accordance with relevant government notifications and orders. The judge directed that any consequential relief be granted to the appellants as per the law.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 15 Jan 1997 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=86555</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>