https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=86530 The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant in a case involving misrepresentation of fiber composition in yarn classification, leading to duty evasion allegations, goods seizure, and penalty imposition. The Tribunal found that there was no deliberate misrepresentation by the appellants as they had declared the intention to use either ramie or flax in the composition, which was approved by the department without alteration. As a result, the Tribunal limited the duty recovery to six months from the show cause notice issuance and set aside the orders of confiscation and penalty imposition. en-us Mon, 23 Dec 1996 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 25 Aug 2011 14:40:53 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=86530 The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant in a case involving misrepresentation of fiber composition in yarn classification, leading to duty evasion allegations, goods seizure, and penalty imposition. The Tribunal found that there was no deliberate misrepresentation by the appellants as they had declared the intention to use either ramie or flax in the composition, which was approved by the department without alteration. As a result, the Tribunal limited the duty recovery to six months from the show cause notice issuance and set aside the orders of confiscation and penalty imposition. Case-Laws Central Excise Mon, 23 Dec 1996 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=86530