<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1996 (11) TMI 227 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=86514</link>
    <description>In the manufacture of motor vehicle parts, excise duty on alleged scrap was not sustained because the manufacturing process was found to involve unavoidable invisible loss. The adjudicating authority relied on an actual experiment showing loss in forging, grinding, threading and allied operations, and the department did not rebut that factual basis. An allowance of 11% invisible loss was also found reasonable, especially where a similar case on comparable facts had accepted 12% loss. On that basis, the disputed scrap quantity was reduced by the allowable loss and the duty demand failed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 29 Nov 1996 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 25 Aug 2011 12:57:06 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=123581" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1996 (11) TMI 227 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=86514</link>
      <description>In the manufacture of motor vehicle parts, excise duty on alleged scrap was not sustained because the manufacturing process was found to involve unavoidable invisible loss. The adjudicating authority relied on an actual experiment showing loss in forging, grinding, threading and allied operations, and the department did not rebut that factual basis. An allowance of 11% invisible loss was also found reasonable, especially where a similar case on comparable facts had accepted 12% loss. On that basis, the disputed scrap quantity was reduced by the allowable loss and the duty demand failed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 29 Nov 1996 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=86514</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>