<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1996 (10) TMI 306 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=86506</link>
    <description>Rule 173H permits duty-paid goods to be returned to the factory for remaking, refining, reconditioning, repair or similar processing and re-cleared without fresh duty where the process does not amount to manufacture and prescribed conditions are met. Goods originally assessed to excise duty do not become liable to differential duty merely because reconditioning permits resale at a higher price. A fresh levy may arise only where processing produces a new and distinct commodity or breaches conditions governing return and re-clearance. Reassessment solely on the basis of the higher resale price would result in double taxation.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 29 Oct 1996 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 25 Aug 2011 12:38:50 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=123573" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1996 (10) TMI 306 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=86506</link>
      <description>Rule 173H permits duty-paid goods to be returned to the factory for remaking, refining, reconditioning, repair or similar processing and re-cleared without fresh duty where the process does not amount to manufacture and prescribed conditions are met. Goods originally assessed to excise duty do not become liable to differential duty merely because reconditioning permits resale at a higher price. A fresh levy may arise only where processing produces a new and distinct commodity or breaches conditions governing return and re-clearance. Reassessment solely on the basis of the higher resale price would result in double taxation.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 29 Oct 1996 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=86506</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>