<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1996 (8) TMI 316 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=86477</link>
    <description>Rule 57-Q was interpreted broadly to cover equipment that assists the manufacturing process, not only machinery that directly changes goods. Material handling during manufacture was treated as part of manufacture, so a hydraulic mobile crane used to move raw materials and semi-finished goods and to facilitate galvanisation qualified as capital goods. Modvat credit was therefore admissible under Rule 57-Q.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 01 Aug 1996 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 25 Aug 2011 11:16:13 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=123544" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1996 (8) TMI 316 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=86477</link>
      <description>Rule 57-Q was interpreted broadly to cover equipment that assists the manufacturing process, not only machinery that directly changes goods. Material handling during manufacture was treated as part of manufacture, so a hydraulic mobile crane used to move raw materials and semi-finished goods and to facilitate galvanisation qualified as capital goods. Modvat credit was therefore admissible under Rule 57-Q.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 01 Aug 1996 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=86477</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>