<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1996 (7) TMI 377 - CEGAT, MADRAS</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=86471</link>
    <description>An exemption notification using the phrase &quot;in the manufacture of&quot; was construed narrowly: goods merely facilitating production within a 100% export-oriented unit did not qualify unless they were themselves used in manufacturing articles meant solely for export. On that basis, foundation nuts and structures were held ineligible for duty-free treatment under Notification No. 123/81. The question of who bore duty liability on goods cleared against an eligibility certificate was left for lower-authority examination, including whether the supplier had undertaken liability if the goods were not used for the intended purpose.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 04 Jul 1996 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 25 Aug 2011 11:02:28 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=123538" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1996 (7) TMI 377 - CEGAT, MADRAS</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=86471</link>
      <description>An exemption notification using the phrase &quot;in the manufacture of&quot; was construed narrowly: goods merely facilitating production within a 100% export-oriented unit did not qualify unless they were themselves used in manufacturing articles meant solely for export. On that basis, foundation nuts and structures were held ineligible for duty-free treatment under Notification No. 123/81. The question of who bore duty liability on goods cleared against an eligibility certificate was left for lower-authority examination, including whether the supplier had undertaken liability if the goods were not used for the intended purpose.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 04 Jul 1996 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=86471</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>