<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1996 (4) TMI 337 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=86462</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the classification of the hydraulic chair under Heading 94.01/04, setting aside the Collector&#039;s order and ruling in favor of the Revenue. The judgment emphasized the significance of international nomenclature like the HSN for interpreting tariff classifications and highlighted the impact of alignment with the BTN on classification decisions.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Sat, 13 Apr 1996 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 24 Aug 2011 18:53:46 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=123529" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1996 (4) TMI 337 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=86462</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the classification of the hydraulic chair under Heading 94.01/04, setting aside the Collector&#039;s order and ruling in favor of the Revenue. The judgment emphasized the significance of international nomenclature like the HSN for interpreting tariff classifications and highlighted the impact of alignment with the BTN on classification decisions.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Sat, 13 Apr 1996 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=86462</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>