<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1997 (3) TMI 190 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=86446</link>
    <description>A buyer is treated as a related person only where there is mutuality of interest between the units, including direct or indirect association with the seller&#039;s business or a flow back of money. On the stated facts, no evidence established such mutuality or any money flow back, so the buyer was not a related person. Trade discount could not be disallowed merely because it was not uniform across buyers; the controlling consideration was whether the discount was known to the buyer at the time of clearance. On that basis, disallowance of the trade discount was unjustified.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 25 Mar 1997 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 24 Aug 2011 18:03:56 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=123513" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1997 (3) TMI 190 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=86446</link>
      <description>A buyer is treated as a related person only where there is mutuality of interest between the units, including direct or indirect association with the seller&#039;s business or a flow back of money. On the stated facts, no evidence established such mutuality or any money flow back, so the buyer was not a related person. Trade discount could not be disallowed merely because it was not uniform across buyers; the controlling consideration was whether the discount was known to the buyer at the time of clearance. On that basis, disallowance of the trade discount was unjustified.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 25 Mar 1997 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=86446</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>