<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1997 (3) TMI 186 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=86442</link>
    <description>A lyophiliser classified under Heading 84.19 was held not to fall within the exclusion for refrigerating or air-conditioning machinery under Notification No. 155/86-C.E. The heading covers machinery used for treatment of materials involving change of temperature, including drying and evaporating, and the HSN basis treated lyophilisation as evaporating or drying plant. The fact that refrigeration is used at some stage does not change the essential character of the goods where the dominant function is evaporation or drying. The exclusion was therefore confined to machinery whose essential character was refrigerating or cooling, and the notification benefit remained available.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 20 Mar 1997 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 24 Aug 2011 17:46:28 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=123509" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1997 (3) TMI 186 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=86442</link>
      <description>A lyophiliser classified under Heading 84.19 was held not to fall within the exclusion for refrigerating or air-conditioning machinery under Notification No. 155/86-C.E. The heading covers machinery used for treatment of materials involving change of temperature, including drying and evaporating, and the HSN basis treated lyophilisation as evaporating or drying plant. The fact that refrigeration is used at some stage does not change the essential character of the goods where the dominant function is evaporation or drying. The exclusion was therefore confined to machinery whose essential character was refrigerating or cooling, and the notification benefit remained available.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 20 Mar 1997 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=86442</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>