<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1997 (3) TMI 175 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=86431</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the appeal and cross-objection, emphasizing the need for proper redetermination of assessable value and the correct excise duty payable. It clarified the jurisdictional boundaries of the Collector (Appeals) in cases of refund recovery, stating that the Collector of Central Excise misdirected himself by ordering recovery without establishing any illegality or impropriety in the refund order. The Tribunal concluded that the Collector could not direct the Assistant Collector to seek recovery through the Collector (Appeals).</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 04 Mar 1997 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 24 Aug 2011 17:26:55 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=123498" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1997 (3) TMI 175 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=86431</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the appeal and cross-objection, emphasizing the need for proper redetermination of assessable value and the correct excise duty payable. It clarified the jurisdictional boundaries of the Collector (Appeals) in cases of refund recovery, stating that the Collector of Central Excise misdirected himself by ordering recovery without establishing any illegality or impropriety in the refund order. The Tribunal concluded that the Collector could not direct the Assistant Collector to seek recovery through the Collector (Appeals).</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 04 Mar 1997 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=86431</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>