<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1997 (2) TMI 224 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=86416</link>
    <description>Goods cleared as a project import under Heading 9801 were not, for that reason alone, excluded from a separate exemption notification applicable on their merits. The project-import notification expressly preserved the operation of other exemption notifications, and the imported machinery for noodle manufacture fell within the separate notification&#039;s description. Relying on Supreme Court authority, the text states that project-import classification does not bar an importer from claiming another applicable exemption where the goods satisfy that notification&#039;s conditions. The denial of refund was therefore unsustainable.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 18 Feb 1997 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 24 Aug 2011 16:54:30 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=123483" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1997 (2) TMI 224 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=86416</link>
      <description>Goods cleared as a project import under Heading 9801 were not, for that reason alone, excluded from a separate exemption notification applicable on their merits. The project-import notification expressly preserved the operation of other exemption notifications, and the imported machinery for noodle manufacture fell within the separate notification&#039;s description. Relying on Supreme Court authority, the text states that project-import classification does not bar an importer from claiming another applicable exemption where the goods satisfy that notification&#039;s conditions. The denial of refund was therefore unsustainable.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 18 Feb 1997 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=86416</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>