<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1997 (2) TMI 220 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=86412</link>
    <description>Dry distemper manufactured by the appellant was held to fall within the exemption for mixtures of the nature of pigments or dry colours prepared by admixture of the goods listed in the schedule under Notification No. 114/73 as amended. The Tribunal applied the notification conditions and noted that the same product had already been found eligible in an earlier decision arising from the same impugned order. The duty demand was therefore not sustainable.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 12 Feb 1997 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 24 Aug 2011 16:46:42 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=123479" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1997 (2) TMI 220 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=86412</link>
      <description>Dry distemper manufactured by the appellant was held to fall within the exemption for mixtures of the nature of pigments or dry colours prepared by admixture of the goods listed in the schedule under Notification No. 114/73 as amended. The Tribunal applied the notification conditions and noted that the same product had already been found eligible in an earlier decision arising from the same impugned order. The duty demand was therefore not sustainable.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 12 Feb 1997 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=86412</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>