<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1997 (2) TMI 218 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=86410</link>
    <description>Notification No. 69/87 did not extend exemption to mechanical seal assembly and heat plug with washer classified under heading 8483.90 because Notification No. 132/87-Cus. expressly excluded parts of goods falling under heading 84.83. The Tribunal also treated its earlier decision in the appellant&#039;s own case on the same issue as governing the present dispute. On that basis, the claimed customs exemption was unavailable and the appeal failed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 12 Feb 1997 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 24 Aug 2011 16:21:10 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=123477" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1997 (2) TMI 218 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=86410</link>
      <description>Notification No. 69/87 did not extend exemption to mechanical seal assembly and heat plug with washer classified under heading 8483.90 because Notification No. 132/87-Cus. expressly excluded parts of goods falling under heading 84.83. The Tribunal also treated its earlier decision in the appellant&#039;s own case on the same issue as governing the present dispute. On that basis, the claimed customs exemption was unavailable and the appeal failed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 12 Feb 1997 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=86410</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>