<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1997 (2) TMI 217 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=86409</link>
    <description>Mercury used in the manufacture of caustic soda was treated as an eligible input for Modvat credit under Rule 57A because it was essential to the electrolytic manufacturing process and used in relation to manufacture. It was not shown to fall within any express exclusion in the rule&#039;s explanation, and the prevailing view was that its role as a consumable input did not make it machinery or equipment. On that basis, the denial of credit was not sustained.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 11 Feb 1997 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 24 Aug 2011 16:16:37 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=123476" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1997 (2) TMI 217 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=86409</link>
      <description>Mercury used in the manufacture of caustic soda was treated as an eligible input for Modvat credit under Rule 57A because it was essential to the electrolytic manufacturing process and used in relation to manufacture. It was not shown to fall within any express exclusion in the rule&#039;s explanation, and the prevailing view was that its role as a consumable input did not make it machinery or equipment. On that basis, the denial of credit was not sustained.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 11 Feb 1997 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=86409</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>