<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1997 (2) TMI 203 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=86395</link>
    <description>Caustic soda used for cleaning glass bottles before filling was treated as an eligible input used in relation to the manufacture of aerated water. The Tribunal followed the ratio already laid down in the appellant&#039;s own earlier case and accepted that the cleaning material had a sufficient nexus with the manufacturing process. The issue was therefore decided in favour of the assessee, and the appeal was allowed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 05 Feb 1997 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 24 Aug 2011 15:32:49 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=123462" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1997 (2) TMI 203 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=86395</link>
      <description>Caustic soda used for cleaning glass bottles before filling was treated as an eligible input used in relation to the manufacture of aerated water. The Tribunal followed the ratio already laid down in the appellant&#039;s own earlier case and accepted that the cleaning material had a sufficient nexus with the manufacturing process. The issue was therefore decided in favour of the assessee, and the appeal was allowed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 05 Feb 1997 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=86395</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>