<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1997 (1) TMI 234 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=86379</link>
    <description>For valuation under the amended Explanation to Section 4(4)(d)(ii) of the Central Excise Act, 1944, only the effective rate of duty is deductible from a cum-duty price. Any amount collected in excess in the name of duty forms part of the cum-duty price and must be included when recalculating assessable value. The tariff rate of duty is not the proper deduction for this purpose, and the demand was sustained on that basis.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 29 Jan 1997 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 24 Aug 2011 13:34:38 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=123446" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1997 (1) TMI 234 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=86379</link>
      <description>For valuation under the amended Explanation to Section 4(4)(d)(ii) of the Central Excise Act, 1944, only the effective rate of duty is deductible from a cum-duty price. Any amount collected in excess in the name of duty forms part of the cum-duty price and must be included when recalculating assessable value. The tariff rate of duty is not the proper deduction for this purpose, and the demand was sustained on that basis.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 29 Jan 1997 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=86379</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>