<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1997 (1) TMI 228 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=86373</link>
    <description>The Tribunal set aside the initial order and remanded the case for fresh adjudication due to the denial of the right to cross-examine the authority issuing the test report, which was deemed a violation of natural justice. The judgment emphasized the importance of cross-examination in cases relying on test reports for evidence to ensure a fair process.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 27 Jan 1997 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 24 Aug 2011 13:18:30 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=123440" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1997 (1) TMI 228 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=86373</link>
      <description>The Tribunal set aside the initial order and remanded the case for fresh adjudication due to the denial of the right to cross-examine the authority issuing the test report, which was deemed a violation of natural justice. The judgment emphasized the importance of cross-examination in cases relying on test reports for evidence to ensure a fair process.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 27 Jan 1997 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=86373</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>