<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1997 (1) TMI 183 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=86328</link>
    <description>Modvat credit cannot be denied merely because the declared description or Chapter 72 sub-heading of hot rolled steel strips differs from the inputs actually received, where the goods are duty-paid and otherwise identifiable. A minor variation in width causing a difference in description or classification was treated as insufficient to defeat credit when the duty-paid character of the inputs was not in dispute. On that basis, the credit was held admissible to the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 08 Jan 1997 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 24 Aug 2011 11:19:07 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=123395" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1997 (1) TMI 183 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=86328</link>
      <description>Modvat credit cannot be denied merely because the declared description or Chapter 72 sub-heading of hot rolled steel strips differs from the inputs actually received, where the goods are duty-paid and otherwise identifiable. A minor variation in width causing a difference in description or classification was treated as insufficient to defeat credit when the duty-paid character of the inputs was not in dispute. On that basis, the credit was held admissible to the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 08 Jan 1997 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=86328</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>