<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1996 (12) TMI 183 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=86309</link>
    <description>Notification No. 125/86-Cus. was construed on its plain language, and Sl. No. 25 was held to apply only to filling and top sealing machines for thermo-formed trays. A GASTI filling and aluminium lid sealing machine for thermo-formed cups did not fall within that entry, especially because cup-sealing machines were brought into exemption only by a later separate entry and the imported machine was not shown to be capable of top sealing trays. The exemption benefit was therefore denied.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 16 Dec 1996 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 23 Aug 2011 18:28:45 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=123376" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1996 (12) TMI 183 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=86309</link>
      <description>Notification No. 125/86-Cus. was construed on its plain language, and Sl. No. 25 was held to apply only to filling and top sealing machines for thermo-formed trays. A GASTI filling and aluminium lid sealing machine for thermo-formed cups did not fall within that entry, especially because cup-sealing machines were brought into exemption only by a later separate entry and the imported machine was not shown to be capable of top sealing trays. The exemption benefit was therefore denied.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 16 Dec 1996 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=86309</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>