<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1996 (11) TMI 219 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=86298</link>
    <description>A small-scale industrial unit could simultaneously claim exemption under Notification No. 175/86 for one product and take Modvat credit for other goods where the benefits related to different items. The Tribunal examined the rectification request against its earlier precedent and noted that the same view had been upheld by the Apex Court. On that basis, it found no mistake apparent on the face of the record and declined to recall the earlier order.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 29 Nov 1996 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 23 Aug 2011 17:58:02 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=123365" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1996 (11) TMI 219 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=86298</link>
      <description>A small-scale industrial unit could simultaneously claim exemption under Notification No. 175/86 for one product and take Modvat credit for other goods where the benefits related to different items. The Tribunal examined the rectification request against its earlier precedent and noted that the same view had been upheld by the Apex Court. On that basis, it found no mistake apparent on the face of the record and declined to recall the earlier order.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 29 Nov 1996 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=86298</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>