<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1996 (11) TMI 211 - CEGAT, MADRAS</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=86290</link>
    <description>The Tribunal held that inspection and testing charges arranged and paid for by customers should not be included in the assessable value for excise duty calculation unless they replace quality control tests conducted by the manufacturer. The appeal of the revenue was dismissed based on this interpretation, following the precedent set in a previous case.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 21 Nov 1996 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 17 Aug 2011 10:39:02 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=123357" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1996 (11) TMI 211 - CEGAT, MADRAS</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=86290</link>
      <description>The Tribunal held that inspection and testing charges arranged and paid for by customers should not be included in the assessable value for excise duty calculation unless they replace quality control tests conducted by the manufacturer. The appeal of the revenue was dismissed based on this interpretation, following the precedent set in a previous case.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 21 Nov 1996 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=86290</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>