<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1996 (10) TMI 299 - CEGAT, MADRAS</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=86269</link>
    <description>The Tribunal held that an arrangement for return between buyers and sellers is sufficient for considering packing material as returnable, even without physical return. The judgment emphasized the importance of the arrangement over the actual return of goods. Consequently, the appellants were entitled to a deduction from the assessable value and a refund for the amount paid under protest.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 30 Oct 1996 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 16 Aug 2011 18:26:01 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=123336" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1996 (10) TMI 299 - CEGAT, MADRAS</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=86269</link>
      <description>The Tribunal held that an arrangement for return between buyers and sellers is sufficient for considering packing material as returnable, even without physical return. The judgment emphasized the importance of the arrangement over the actual return of goods. Consequently, the appellants were entitled to a deduction from the assessable value and a refund for the amount paid under protest.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 30 Oct 1996 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=86269</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>