<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1996 (10) TMI 297 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=86267</link>
    <description>An exemption notification that makes non-availment of Modvat credit an express condition cannot be combined with Modvat treatment for the same inputs and final products in the same factory and period. The manufacturer&#039;s attempt to split the same production line between exemption under Notification No. 69/86-C.E. and Modvat credit failed because the notification required duty-paid inputs and no prior credit under Rule 57G. The Board clarification cited by the assessee was confined to an end-use exemption and did not override the notification&#039;s own restriction. The principle in Chandrapur Magnet Wire applied only where already-taken credit was reversed before exemption was claimed. The appeals therefore failed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 30 Oct 1996 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 16 Aug 2011 18:23:53 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=123334" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1996 (10) TMI 297 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=86267</link>
      <description>An exemption notification that makes non-availment of Modvat credit an express condition cannot be combined with Modvat treatment for the same inputs and final products in the same factory and period. The manufacturer&#039;s attempt to split the same production line between exemption under Notification No. 69/86-C.E. and Modvat credit failed because the notification required duty-paid inputs and no prior credit under Rule 57G. The Board clarification cited by the assessee was confined to an end-use exemption and did not override the notification&#039;s own restriction. The principle in Chandrapur Magnet Wire applied only where already-taken credit was reversed before exemption was claimed. The appeals therefore failed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 30 Oct 1996 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=86267</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>