<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1996 (10) TMI 293 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=86263</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the impugned order and rejected the appeal, ruling in favor of the respondent based on the fulfillment of the conditions of Notification No. 258/90-Cus. The respondent was entitled to duty exemption despite a temporary break in the journey, as the Tribunal found no legal or factual deficiencies in the Collector (Appeals) decision.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 23 Oct 1996 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 16 Aug 2011 17:56:33 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=123330" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1996 (10) TMI 293 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=86263</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the impugned order and rejected the appeal, ruling in favor of the respondent based on the fulfillment of the conditions of Notification No. 258/90-Cus. The respondent was entitled to duty exemption despite a temporary break in the journey, as the Tribunal found no legal or factual deficiencies in the Collector (Appeals) decision.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 23 Oct 1996 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=86263</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>