<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1996 (10) TMI 279 - CEGAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=86249</link>
    <description>A taxing notification governing Modvat credit documents was construed strictly, and the dispute was whether gate passes issued before 1-4-1994 but endorsed after that date fell within Entry 10 of Notification No. 16/94-C.E. (N.T.). The Tribunal noted that the notification required the relevant documents to have been issued before 1-4-1994 and credit to be taken by 30-6-1994, and treated the cessation of gate pass issuance from 1-4-1994 as supporting exclusion of later-endorsed passes. Because the scope of the entry was debatable, the issue was treated as a referable question of law, and the matter was referred to the High Court.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 07 Oct 1996 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 16 Aug 2011 17:12:59 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=123316" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1996 (10) TMI 279 - CEGAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=86249</link>
      <description>A taxing notification governing Modvat credit documents was construed strictly, and the dispute was whether gate passes issued before 1-4-1994 but endorsed after that date fell within Entry 10 of Notification No. 16/94-C.E. (N.T.). The Tribunal noted that the notification required the relevant documents to have been issued before 1-4-1994 and credit to be taken by 30-6-1994, and treated the cessation of gate pass issuance from 1-4-1994 as supporting exclusion of later-endorsed passes. Because the scope of the entry was debatable, the issue was treated as a referable question of law, and the matter was referred to the High Court.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 07 Oct 1996 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=86249</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>