<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1996 (8) TMI 314 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=86237</link>
    <description>Imported steel articles were treated as scrap where the record did not prove they were usable as such and customs had themselves valued them on a scrap basis. The Tribunal accepted that dormant scrap may include obsolete, worn-out, broken or otherwise discarded metal items from consuming industries. As the segregated items formed only a small part of the consignment and the scrap claim was not displaced by the evidence, confiscation, redemption fine and penalty were set aside.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 05 Aug 1996 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 16 Aug 2011 16:44:12 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=123304" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1996 (8) TMI 314 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=86237</link>
      <description>Imported steel articles were treated as scrap where the record did not prove they were usable as such and customs had themselves valued them on a scrap basis. The Tribunal accepted that dormant scrap may include obsolete, worn-out, broken or otherwise discarded metal items from consuming industries. As the segregated items formed only a small part of the consignment and the scrap claim was not displaced by the evidence, confiscation, redemption fine and penalty were set aside.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 05 Aug 1996 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=86237</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>