<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1997 (1) TMI 172 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=86222</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeals related to the inclusion of special packing cost in the assessable value of metal containers, emphasizing the necessity of packing for goods sold at the factory gate. The Tribunal rejected the classification of buyers requesting special packing and dismissed the appeal concerning a notice for inclusion of packing cost as unnecessary, affirming the timeliness of the notice.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 15 Jan 1997 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 16 Aug 2011 15:31:13 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=123289" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1997 (1) TMI 172 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=86222</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeals related to the inclusion of special packing cost in the assessable value of metal containers, emphasizing the necessity of packing for goods sold at the factory gate. The Tribunal rejected the classification of buyers requesting special packing and dismissed the appeal concerning a notice for inclusion of packing cost as unnecessary, affirming the timeliness of the notice.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 15 Jan 1997 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=86222</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>