<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1997 (1) TMI 171 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=86221</link>
    <description>Personal computers and photocopiers used directly in a printing process for composing matter, preparing transparent copies and making offset plates were treated as eligible for Project Import benefit under Heading 9801 because their use was integral to the printing industry and they were included in the project report filed at contract registration. The Revenue&#039;s challenge failed on that basis.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 13 Jan 1997 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 16 Aug 2011 15:30:02 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=123288" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1997 (1) TMI 171 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=86221</link>
      <description>Personal computers and photocopiers used directly in a printing process for composing matter, preparing transparent copies and making offset plates were treated as eligible for Project Import benefit under Heading 9801 because their use was integral to the printing industry and they were included in the project report filed at contract registration. The Revenue&#039;s challenge failed on that basis.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 13 Jan 1997 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=86221</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>