<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1997 (1) TMI 170 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=86220</link>
    <description>In valuing captively consumed intermediate goods under Rule 6(b)(ii), the profit margin of the finished product may be relevant, but only as a fact-sensitive guide. The text states that the notional profit for the intermediate product must reflect the cost structure, product differences and any necessary adjustment, and the finished product margin cannot be applied mechanically as a fixed rule where the goods are not comparable. On the facts noted, adoption of a 30.89% notional profit margin for printing ink was not accepted and the margin was reduced to 20%.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 10 Jan 1997 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 16 Aug 2011 15:28:08 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=123287" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1997 (1) TMI 170 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=86220</link>
      <description>In valuing captively consumed intermediate goods under Rule 6(b)(ii), the profit margin of the finished product may be relevant, but only as a fact-sensitive guide. The text states that the notional profit for the intermediate product must reflect the cost structure, product differences and any necessary adjustment, and the finished product margin cannot be applied mechanically as a fixed rule where the goods are not comparable. On the facts noted, adoption of a 30.89% notional profit margin for printing ink was not accepted and the margin was reduced to 20%.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 10 Jan 1997 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=86220</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>