<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1996 (12) TMI 171 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=86215</link>
    <description>The appeal involved a dispute over the classification of filters under the customs tariff, specifically regarding their interchangeability with motor vehicle parts. The appellants sought reclassification under different tariff headings and duty benefits. They argued that the filters were not for internal combustion engines but for transmission lines, citing specific customs notifications. The court emphasized the restrictions under Section 149 of the Customs Act on amending documents post-clearance and upheld the lower authorities&#039; decision to reject the refund claim due to goods leaving Customs control. The appeal was dismissed, affirming the original classification and duty rate.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 27 Dec 1996 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 16 Aug 2011 15:02:39 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=123282" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1996 (12) TMI 171 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=86215</link>
      <description>The appeal involved a dispute over the classification of filters under the customs tariff, specifically regarding their interchangeability with motor vehicle parts. The appellants sought reclassification under different tariff headings and duty benefits. They argued that the filters were not for internal combustion engines but for transmission lines, citing specific customs notifications. The court emphasized the restrictions under Section 149 of the Customs Act on amending documents post-clearance and upheld the lower authorities&#039; decision to reject the refund claim due to goods leaving Customs control. The appeal was dismissed, affirming the original classification and duty rate.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 27 Dec 1996 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=86215</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>