<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1996 (11) TMI 179 - CEGAT, MADRAS</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=86193</link>
    <description>Concessional assessment under Heading 98.01 applies only where imported machinery or equipment is shown to relate to a certified project or to substantial expansion under the Project Import Regulations, 1986. The regulations require proof of a certified project, substantial expansion increasing installed capacity by at least 25 per cent, and a qualifying functional link between the goods and the project. Because the record did not establish which project had been certified or that the transmission equipment formed part of a valid project import, the concessional benefit could not be sustained. The lower authority&#039;s order was set aside and the matter remitted for fresh adjudication after verification of project import eligibility.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 21 Nov 1996 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 10 Aug 2011 17:18:06 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=123260" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1996 (11) TMI 179 - CEGAT, MADRAS</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=86193</link>
      <description>Concessional assessment under Heading 98.01 applies only where imported machinery or equipment is shown to relate to a certified project or to substantial expansion under the Project Import Regulations, 1986. The regulations require proof of a certified project, substantial expansion increasing installed capacity by at least 25 per cent, and a qualifying functional link between the goods and the project. Because the record did not establish which project had been certified or that the transmission equipment formed part of a valid project import, the concessional benefit could not be sustained. The lower authority&#039;s order was set aside and the matter remitted for fresh adjudication after verification of project import eligibility.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 21 Nov 1996 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=86193</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>