<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1996 (10) TMI 274 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=86171</link>
    <description>The Tribunal affirmed that the value of Electric Motors supplied optionally and not fitted to Power-driven Pumps or Agitators at the time of clearance should not be included in the assessable value of these goods. The larger period of limitation under Section 11A of the Central Excise Act, 1944, was deemed inapplicable as there was no deliberate misstatement or suppression of facts by the respondent. The appeal was dismissed by the Tribunal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 25 Oct 1996 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 11 Dec 2015 14:24:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=123238" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1996 (10) TMI 274 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=86171</link>
      <description>The Tribunal affirmed that the value of Electric Motors supplied optionally and not fitted to Power-driven Pumps or Agitators at the time of clearance should not be included in the assessable value of these goods. The larger period of limitation under Section 11A of the Central Excise Act, 1944, was deemed inapplicable as there was no deliberate misstatement or suppression of facts by the respondent. The appeal was dismissed by the Tribunal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 25 Oct 1996 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=86171</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>