<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1996 (10) TMI 260 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=86157</link>
    <description>Notification No. 120/75 applied only where the invoice price was a genuine price and was not influenced by any commercial, financial or other relationship between manufacturer and buyer. On the facts discussed, contractual clauses for procurement of raw materials and testing expenses did not amount to special favour or price influence, and the manufacturer&#039;s responsibility for ingredients remained intact. The buyer&#039;s wholesale price therefore could not be adopted as the duty basis. The commentary concludes that the condition in proviso (iv) was satisfied, making the demand unsustainable and the refund claim maintainable.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 10 Oct 1996 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 10 Aug 2011 15:19:06 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=123224" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1996 (10) TMI 260 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=86157</link>
      <description>Notification No. 120/75 applied only where the invoice price was a genuine price and was not influenced by any commercial, financial or other relationship between manufacturer and buyer. On the facts discussed, contractual clauses for procurement of raw materials and testing expenses did not amount to special favour or price influence, and the manufacturer&#039;s responsibility for ingredients remained intact. The buyer&#039;s wholesale price therefore could not be adopted as the duty basis. The commentary concludes that the condition in proviso (iv) was satisfied, making the demand unsustainable and the refund claim maintainable.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 10 Oct 1996 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=86157</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>