https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=86147 The Madhya Pradesh High Court, in a judgment by A.R. Tiwari, J., addressed two connected petitions challenging a show cause notice and an order of demand related to Modvat credit. The Court emphasized the need for matters involving disputed facts to be adjudicated by the appropriate statutory forum rather than through writ jurisdiction. It underscored the importance of consistency and uniformity in legal proceedings, directing the petitioner to pursue available remedies through appeal within a specified timeframe. The judgment highlighted the significance of adhering to statutory procedures and refraining from using writ jurisdiction to resolve disputed factual issues. en-us Tue, 24 Sep 1996 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 10 Aug 2011 14:51:50 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=86147 The Madhya Pradesh High Court, in a judgment by A.R. Tiwari, J., addressed two connected petitions challenging a show cause notice and an order of demand related to Modvat credit. The Court emphasized the need for matters involving disputed facts to be adjudicated by the appropriate statutory forum rather than through writ jurisdiction. It underscored the importance of consistency and uniformity in legal proceedings, directing the petitioner to pursue available remedies through appeal within a specified timeframe. The judgment highlighted the significance of adhering to statutory procedures and refraining from using writ jurisdiction to resolve disputed factual issues. Case-Laws Central Excise Tue, 24 Sep 1996 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=86147