<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1996 (9) TMI 385 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=86136</link>
    <description>The amending exemption notification was treated as retrospective under the Central Duties of Excise (Retrospective Exemption) Act, 1986, so the substituted tariff heading had to be read into the earlier small-scale exemption notification from 1-3-1986. On that basis, exemption could not be denied merely because the later heading was omitted from the original annexure. The notification&#039;s own conditions still governed eligibility, so the assessee&#039;s entitlement had to be examined on merits by the excise authority under the applicable exemption terms.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 10 Sep 1996 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 10 Aug 2011 14:31:33 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=123203" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1996 (9) TMI 385 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=86136</link>
      <description>The amending exemption notification was treated as retrospective under the Central Duties of Excise (Retrospective Exemption) Act, 1986, so the substituted tariff heading had to be read into the earlier small-scale exemption notification from 1-3-1986. On that basis, exemption could not be denied merely because the later heading was omitted from the original annexure. The notification&#039;s own conditions still governed eligibility, so the assessee&#039;s entitlement had to be examined on merits by the excise authority under the applicable exemption terms.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 10 Sep 1996 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=86136</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>