<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1996 (8) TMI 313 - CEGAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=86132</link>
    <description>Where a reply to a show cause notice is shown to have been received by the department, a presumption arises that the communication contains that reply, unless the department rebuts it by showing it related to some other matter. If the adjudicating authority fails to consider the reply before passing the order, the order cannot be sustained. The matter must then be reconsidered after giving the affected party an opportunity of personal hearing and deciding afresh according to law.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 30 Aug 1996 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 10 Aug 2011 14:27:29 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=123199" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1996 (8) TMI 313 - CEGAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=86132</link>
      <description>Where a reply to a show cause notice is shown to have been received by the department, a presumption arises that the communication contains that reply, unless the department rebuts it by showing it related to some other matter. If the adjudicating authority fails to consider the reply before passing the order, the order cannot be sustained. The matter must then be reconsidered after giving the affected party an opportunity of personal hearing and deciding afresh according to law.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 30 Aug 1996 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=86132</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>