<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1996 (8) TMI 303 - CEGAT, MADRAS</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=86122</link>
    <description>Modvat credit was admissible on molybdenum wire used in the formation of tungsten filament for fluorescent tubes because the wire was a technical necessity in manufacture and was consumed in the process by dissolving into the filament. Applying the Larger Bench interpretation of the expressions &quot;apparatus&quot;, &quot;appliance&quot; and &quot;tool&quot;, together with the Board&#039;s clarification on wires as used, the Tribunal held that the wire did not fall within the exclusion under Rule 57A of the Central Excise Rules, 1944. The Revenue&#039;s objection therefore failed, and credit on the wire was allowed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 06 Aug 1996 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 10 Aug 2011 13:17:24 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=123189" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1996 (8) TMI 303 - CEGAT, MADRAS</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=86122</link>
      <description>Modvat credit was admissible on molybdenum wire used in the formation of tungsten filament for fluorescent tubes because the wire was a technical necessity in manufacture and was consumed in the process by dissolving into the filament. Applying the Larger Bench interpretation of the expressions &quot;apparatus&quot;, &quot;appliance&quot; and &quot;tool&quot;, together with the Board&#039;s clarification on wires as used, the Tribunal held that the wire did not fall within the exclusion under Rule 57A of the Central Excise Rules, 1944. The Revenue&#039;s objection therefore failed, and credit on the wire was allowed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 06 Aug 1996 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=86122</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>