<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1996 (7) TMI 373 - CEGAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=86119</link>
    <description>Refusal to grant a requested personal hearing before disposal of the appeal was treated as a denial of a statutory safeguard and a breach of natural justice. Because the appellants were not given an opportunity to explain their case before the appellate authority, the ex parte appellate order could not stand. The order was therefore set aside and the matter remanded to the Commissioner (Appeals) for personal hearing and fresh decision in accordance with law.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 19 Jul 1996 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 10 Aug 2011 13:11:02 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=123186" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1996 (7) TMI 373 - CEGAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=86119</link>
      <description>Refusal to grant a requested personal hearing before disposal of the appeal was treated as a denial of a statutory safeguard and a breach of natural justice. Because the appellants were not given an opportunity to explain their case before the appellate authority, the ex parte appellate order could not stand. The order was therefore set aside and the matter remanded to the Commissioner (Appeals) for personal hearing and fresh decision in accordance with law.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 19 Jul 1996 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=86119</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>